munc13 2 (Vector Biolabs)
Structured Review

Munc13 2, supplied by Vector Biolabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 13 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/munc13 2/product/Vector Biolabs
Average 95 stars, based on 13 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Ethanol Mediated Inhibition of Synaptic Vesicle Recycling at Amygdala Glutamate Synapses Is Dependent upon Munc13-2"
Article Title: Ethanol Mediated Inhibition of Synaptic Vesicle Recycling at Amygdala Glutamate Synapses Is Dependent upon Munc13-2
Journal: Frontiers in Neuroscience
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00424
Figure Legend Snippet: Recovery of the RRP following tetanic stimulation is Munc13-2 dependent and ethanol sensitive. (A) Illustration of the stimulation protocol used to measure RRP recovery. To measure recovery of the RRP, a single 40 Hz, 100 stimulus train (①) was followed by a second 40 Hz, 100 stimulus train (②) with increasing inter-train intervals of 1, 5, and 10 s. The effects of ethanol on recovery were measured 10 min after acute application to the slice. (B) Effects of ethanol on RRP recovery measured in BLA neurons from animals injected with the scrambled control virus. Representative traces corresponding to the first response in each train are shown (B 1 ) with baseline and ethanol condition represented by blue and red traces, respectively, for each recovery interval. Area-under-the-curve measures (B 2 ) for the first five responses were used as a proxy for the RRP. There was a significant main effect of recovery interval (two-way ANOVA, p < 0.05) but no significant effect of ethanol and no interaction between these main factors. (C) Effects of ethanol on RRP recovery measured in BLA neurons from animals injected with the virus expression shRNA against bMunc13-2. As in (B) , representative traces from the first response of each train across the various recovery intervals are shown (C 1 ) . There were significant main effects for both recovery interval (two-way ANOVA, p < 0.001) and ethanol ( p < 0.01) with recovery at the 10 s interval being significantly inhibited by ethanol relative to baseline (Bonferroni's post-test, * p < 0.05).
Techniques Used: Injection, Expressing, shRNA
Figure Legend Snippet: Post-tetanic potentiation is Munc13-2 dependent and ethanol sensitive. (A) Post-tetanic potentiation expressed as the percent amplitude of the first response in the second 40 Hz, 100 stimulus train relative to the first response in the first train. In BLA neurons from B6 mice injected with scrambled control virus, increasing recovery intervals significantly increased the initial second train response amplitude relative to the first train percent first response values (two-way ANOVA, p <0.01), but there was no significant effect of 80 mM ethanol on the development of post-tetanic potentiation at the longer recovery intervals. (B) In BLA neurons from B6 mice injected with virus expressing shRNA against bMunc13-2, interval significantly also increased the expression of post-tetanic potentiation (two-way ANOVA, ** p < 0.01) but this was significantly suppressed by ethanol exposure (## p < 0.01). This effect was specifically significant at the 10 s interval where post-tetantic potentiation was maximal over this interval range (Bonferroni's multiple comparison post-test, * p < 0.05).
Techniques Used: Injection, Expressing, shRNA
Figure Legend Snippet: Munc13-2-dependent ethanol inhibition of the recycling pool of synaptic vesicles is concentration-dependent. (A) Concentration-response relationship for inhibition of synaptic vesicle recycling pool size in BLA neurons from B6 animals injected with scrambled control virus. Ethanol did not significantly inhibit recycling pool size (one-way ANOVA, p = 0.51). (B) Concentration-response relationship in BLA neurons injected with virus expressing shRNA against bMunc13-2. Ethanol inhibition of recycling pool size was both significant (one-way ANOVA, *** p < 0.001) and concentration-dependent (Dunnett's multiple comparison post-test, # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 vs. 0 mM ethanol).
Techniques Used: Inhibition, Concentration Assay, Injection, Expressing, shRNA
